More than a year ago, certain readers of mine reproached the author of a book of vulgarised science for plagiarising my theory without having understood it.  In order to defend himself, and without having forewarned me, he hung a defamatory criticism on the internet to sweep aside my scientific publications in a few lines, which contrary to his allegations all proceed from publications controlled and authorised by scientific arbiters.

Once a text is authorised by these arbiters, its publication is very often nothing more than a very condensed summary of the same, which in fact demands an explication.  A scientist who wishes to make use of such publications, before criticising or authorising, must receive information directly from the author.  This is the normal procedure for every scientist who, far from desiring to appropriate a discovery, wishes to further scientific advancement by making use of the work of others, citing their names as references.  Those who have contacted me have not found the least fault with and support me in my research.

Read the rest of the message ...